Remember that "Final Fantasy VI" Let's Play I was doing a while back? Well, we kinda took a break from it, and I decided to play an RPG I'd never tried before, the largely forgotten, "Final Fantasy Mystic Quest". "Mystic Quest" was made by Square's Osaka division in 1992, who up until that time had only made RPGs on the Nintendo Gameboy... and it shows. The Super Nintendo is an incredible system and at the time was capable of stunning graphics, it was the home to gorgeous games that continue to be regarded as classics to this very day - "Mystic Quest" is not one of them. The game appears to have been made on virtually no budget whatsoever with the most simplistic, repetitive, and horribly horribly dull RPG battle system ever made. There's almost no story, no characters with any depth, very little exploration, no sidequests, and very little strategy.
Let me explain what "Mystic Quest" actually is: repetition. Endless endless repetition. The game is at most ten hours long, and yet 90% of that is padding. You'll spend most of your "Mystic Quest" experience wandering around blocky ugly labyrinths of dungeons with very tight corridors filled with an endless army of pathetically easy enemies blocking your path. You can't skip these guys, you need to kill them to get them out of your way. So you fight through the enemies endlessly, then kill a boss, then you repeat the process over again in another dungeon. Its easily the blandest and most terrible 16 bit RPG I've ever seen, inexcuable in its dullness. But yet somehow it has an amazingly rocking soundtrack.... I don't understand. Honestly there's nothing to hate here, but there's nothing to love either. Games are supposed to be fun, and this game is the absence of fun.
So me and some FFWiki chums LPed the game, and here it is, our entire experience in five long videos:
Friday, November 30, 2012
Monday, November 26, 2012
Eureka Seven Ao
"Eureka Seven Ao" is not going to be a series I will ever forget. Unfortunately I have to live a far worse life now because I have seen this show. I am going to carry a grudge against "Eureka Seven Ao", a mental vendetta of pure fury forever. Even when this existence ends and I'm reincarnated, that future person or creature will feel at an elemental level a raging hatred of "Eureka Seven Ao". Its going right to very depths of my psyche, along with the Star Wars Prequels and "Final Fantasy XIII-2". I am as angry right now writing this review I as have been for anything I have written for this blog. If not more so. But I know until I write and tell the world how goddamn awful "Eureka Seven Ao" is, I will never sleep again. I to vent, badly.
Its been many a year since I've seen a legitimately great anime series. The last one I watched might have been the original "Fullmetal Alchemist", but definitely "Eureka Seven" stands as one of the best Japanese programs I've ever been fortunate enough to experience. Its plot... very little sense, but those details didn't particularly matter to me because it had gorgeous animation, a great romance plotline, and above all else, incredible characters who I truly loved and wanted to see have a happy ending, no matter how confusing and bizarre. "Eureka Seven" doesn't even try to explain what's going on until episode 30, before that it doesn't really have much of a plot at all, its just a teenage boy, Renton, having his first love with an alien girl. It was sweet, I have nothing but positive memories about it. I may in fact have enjoyed "Eureka Seven" more than any other person alive, I think I'm alone with how much I fucking love that series. "Pocket Full of Rainbows", the Eureka Seven movie that gave me that image of a grimacing Nirvash-thing that I put on almost all my negative reviews, was a lazy slapped together fraud created entirely out of reused animation and a nonsensical plot that was indescribably bad. That movie was little more than a con job to steal people's money. So when it was announced last May that they were making a "Eureka Seven" sequel, I was excited, but I could already envision myself many months later furiously typing away into the oblivion, trying to channel my anger into keystrokes.
Well, we're here now. You did it, BONES, you pissed me off. Congrats.
There is no excuse for what went on during the course of "Eureka Seven Ao". The show was never actively terrible, it never got to the point of being directly offensive, at least not until the end. For at least half the running time, it was watchable, if nothing special. But at some point I started to realize: I have no idea what's going on in this series, and I don't particularly like any of these characters. I think BONES realized the problem too, so at some point it feels like this show was rewritten. And then rewritten again. And again. And then a third time. So having watch all twenty-four episodes, I'm left with nothing. I don't know what this was supposed to be. I don't know what they were trying to achieve. Its a mess. A goddamn mess. This is the "Highlander 2" of anime series. Sequels usually suck, but "Eureka Seven Ao" didn't have to be this bad. If only I had any idea what was going on. If only the characters knew what was going on.
Its been many a year since I've seen a legitimately great anime series. The last one I watched might have been the original "Fullmetal Alchemist", but definitely "Eureka Seven" stands as one of the best Japanese programs I've ever been fortunate enough to experience. Its plot... very little sense, but those details didn't particularly matter to me because it had gorgeous animation, a great romance plotline, and above all else, incredible characters who I truly loved and wanted to see have a happy ending, no matter how confusing and bizarre. "Eureka Seven" doesn't even try to explain what's going on until episode 30, before that it doesn't really have much of a plot at all, its just a teenage boy, Renton, having his first love with an alien girl. It was sweet, I have nothing but positive memories about it. I may in fact have enjoyed "Eureka Seven" more than any other person alive, I think I'm alone with how much I fucking love that series. "Pocket Full of Rainbows", the Eureka Seven movie that gave me that image of a grimacing Nirvash-thing that I put on almost all my negative reviews, was a lazy slapped together fraud created entirely out of reused animation and a nonsensical plot that was indescribably bad. That movie was little more than a con job to steal people's money. So when it was announced last May that they were making a "Eureka Seven" sequel, I was excited, but I could already envision myself many months later furiously typing away into the oblivion, trying to channel my anger into keystrokes.
Well, we're here now. You did it, BONES, you pissed me off. Congrats.
There is no excuse for what went on during the course of "Eureka Seven Ao". The show was never actively terrible, it never got to the point of being directly offensive, at least not until the end. For at least half the running time, it was watchable, if nothing special. But at some point I started to realize: I have no idea what's going on in this series, and I don't particularly like any of these characters. I think BONES realized the problem too, so at some point it feels like this show was rewritten. And then rewritten again. And again. And then a third time. So having watch all twenty-four episodes, I'm left with nothing. I don't know what this was supposed to be. I don't know what they were trying to achieve. Its a mess. A goddamn mess. This is the "Highlander 2" of anime series. Sequels usually suck, but "Eureka Seven Ao" didn't have to be this bad. If only I had any idea what was going on. If only the characters knew what was going on.
Sunday, November 25, 2012
Twilight 5: Sucking Long
Oh wow, a Twilight movie sucked. Astonishing.
I guess I shouldn't be surprised that "Twilight 5" was utterly awful. This was a series that began what feels like a lifetime ago with "Twilight", a vapid pointless idiotic movie with utterly unbelievable romance story between two terrible actors who seemingly could not stand the sight of each other. I don't know how I could have forgotten how just incredibly bad the first movies were, they were technical trainwrecks, they were acting trainwrecks. At some point they started getting better, to the point that "Twilight 4" was bizarrely watchable and pretty solid ironic entertainment. And I was legitimately excited for this last one, since the last one actually had pacing, tension, body horror, and surprisingly decent acting from even Kristin Stewart. Well, "Twilight 5" came back and reminded me why these movies suck. This series is shit.
I haven't read the books, but I was told that "Twilight 5" was going to be a huge mess. And it was. I even knew the big twist at the end here, but I couldn't have predicted that this movie would be so friggin' bad. Once again, there's no plot. There is an attempt to build up a huge battle sequence between Michael Sheen's Army of Fruity Vampires and the Last Alliance of Good Vampires and Werewolves, but it takes about two hours for that to get started. The first half hour is meandering pointlessness as the vampires get into various misunderstandings. Then finally we set up the war plotline, and this requires about six hundred new characters to appear. So we'll spend another hour establishing all these people are - because the series wasn't bloated enough with about two dozen pointless characters who never do anything. We need a hundred more. 90% of this movie is boring boring boring nothing. Its basically sleep-inducing. Its not even cringe-worthy like the scenes between Bella and Edward, its just dull people that you don't care about doing little or nothing. This is possibly the most unwatchable movie in terms of boredom of the entire year.
However, its almost worth it since at the end, director Bill Condon has his glorious revenge. Bill Condon, unlike Catherine Hardwicke, who directed the first , is no hack. He's made legitimately great movies like "Dreamgirls" and "Candyman 2"... well scratch the last one, it sucked, but he still made "Dreamgirls". This is a man who is much too good for this shit. And he's had to spend two years of his life working on making Stephenie Meyer's ridiculous "saga" come to life. So I'd be pissed too. In "Twilight 4", he seemed to be giving it his all in order to make the work, and it was his filmmaking ability that made the movie seem watchable, along with how utterly Looney Tunes insane that movie got. Remember Jacob falls in love with a Vampire Baby. In "Twilight 5", he has given up. He's slapped together a piece of crap, because he knows that no matter what he makes, the Twilight fans will love it anyway. However, "Twilight 5" also features the greatest and most monumental case I have ever seen of a director playing a giant joke on his audience. In one battle sequence Condon does more to show how pointless, idiotic, and worthless this series has been, is now, and forever will be then every word I've written on Meyer's work.
I guess I shouldn't be surprised that "Twilight 5" was utterly awful. This was a series that began what feels like a lifetime ago with "Twilight", a vapid pointless idiotic movie with utterly unbelievable romance story between two terrible actors who seemingly could not stand the sight of each other. I don't know how I could have forgotten how just incredibly bad the first movies were, they were technical trainwrecks, they were acting trainwrecks. At some point they started getting better, to the point that "Twilight 4" was bizarrely watchable and pretty solid ironic entertainment. And I was legitimately excited for this last one, since the last one actually had pacing, tension, body horror, and surprisingly decent acting from even Kristin Stewart. Well, "Twilight 5" came back and reminded me why these movies suck. This series is shit.
I haven't read the books, but I was told that "Twilight 5" was going to be a huge mess. And it was. I even knew the big twist at the end here, but I couldn't have predicted that this movie would be so friggin' bad. Once again, there's no plot. There is an attempt to build up a huge battle sequence between Michael Sheen's Army of Fruity Vampires and the Last Alliance of Good Vampires and Werewolves, but it takes about two hours for that to get started. The first half hour is meandering pointlessness as the vampires get into various misunderstandings. Then finally we set up the war plotline, and this requires about six hundred new characters to appear. So we'll spend another hour establishing all these people are - because the series wasn't bloated enough with about two dozen pointless characters who never do anything. We need a hundred more. 90% of this movie is boring boring boring nothing. Its basically sleep-inducing. Its not even cringe-worthy like the scenes between Bella and Edward, its just dull people that you don't care about doing little or nothing. This is possibly the most unwatchable movie in terms of boredom of the entire year.
However, its almost worth it since at the end, director Bill Condon has his glorious revenge. Bill Condon, unlike Catherine Hardwicke, who directed the first , is no hack. He's made legitimately great movies like "Dreamgirls" and "Candyman 2"... well scratch the last one, it sucked, but he still made "Dreamgirls". This is a man who is much too good for this shit. And he's had to spend two years of his life working on making Stephenie Meyer's ridiculous "saga" come to life. So I'd be pissed too. In "Twilight 4", he seemed to be giving it his all in order to make the work, and it was his filmmaking ability that made the movie seem watchable, along with how utterly Looney Tunes insane that movie got. Remember Jacob falls in love with a Vampire Baby. In "Twilight 5", he has given up. He's slapped together a piece of crap, because he knows that no matter what he makes, the Twilight fans will love it anyway. However, "Twilight 5" also features the greatest and most monumental case I have ever seen of a director playing a giant joke on his audience. In one battle sequence Condon does more to show how pointless, idiotic, and worthless this series has been, is now, and forever will be then every word I've written on Meyer's work.
Saturday, November 24, 2012
Life of Pi
Ang Lee is an author of an eclectic but well-respected series of films in several genres and languages. He's done kung-fu, superheroes, comedy, Oscar bait, and movies about gay cowboys eating pudding. Unfortunately, for all his critical acclaim, he has never actually made a good movie. When it came to the basic action films, "Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon" focused too much on social status and emotions instead of fighting, and "Hulk" tried far too hard to establish an emotional undertone to the Incredible Hulk, when really all I wanted was for some Hulk Smash. "Brokeback Mountain", for all its controversy was still a painfully dull and generic forlorn love story, only with dudes. Ang Lee's best movie, ironically, is the mostly mediocre "Taking Woodstock", and half that movie's charm comes from it being Dmitri Martin's only starring role. Ultimately Ang Lee gives me the impression that he doesn't really get it. He makes complex technically-competent, if not even beautiful films with grand emotions about rejecting society or giving in to furious passion, but oddly his movies are oddly inert. They're about emotions, but they don't really have much emotion to them. They try terribly hard to make an impression, but they never really seem to quite work.
"Life of Pi" is based upon the 2001 adventure novel by Yann Martel, which I have not read. Personally I make a point to avoid reading books about upcoming interesting movies. If the book is good, the movie will bungle the meaning and cut out too many important details, and if the movie is good, than that means I can appreciate the story and if I'm sufficiently interested, I can read the book. Then if the movie is bad, like really bad, I can read the book and realize how badly the filmmakers screwed up*. Personally I enjoy movies more than books, its just the kind of person I am. "Life of Pi", luckily, seems to be a movie that managed to rather brilliantly fit in all of the most important pieces of meaning from the original novel, so I'd say "Life of Pi" as a movie is fulfilling enough that I can skip Yann Martel's novel. Its also Ang Lee's first truly successful effort, he was bound to get it right eventually.
At its core "Life of Pi" is actually a rather clever parable about the nature of faith. There is a frame story around the tale that Ang Lee included which deals with a fictionalized Yann Martel meeting his character, Pi Patel, and learning the man's story. Pi tells his life story, where he was shipwrecked all alone on a lifeboat with a single companion, Richard Parker**, a Bengal Tiger. This mismatched pair have to brave the endless deserts of the Pacific Ocean all alone in the middle of the endless blue. Unfortunately, that pay-off is rather subtle and requires spoilers. I'd have no choice in this review but to give it away, so I'd say you should watching "Life of Pi" first before reading further. Not that you'll be very bored during the viewing, since again, its a story of a boy and a tiger lost at sea. Its also a gorgeous movie with amazing visuals. Ang Lee films nature beautifully, and the CG work on the tiger is perfectly photo-realistic. Not a movie that should be missed.
"Life of Pi" is based upon the 2001 adventure novel by Yann Martel, which I have not read. Personally I make a point to avoid reading books about upcoming interesting movies. If the book is good, the movie will bungle the meaning and cut out too many important details, and if the movie is good, than that means I can appreciate the story and if I'm sufficiently interested, I can read the book. Then if the movie is bad, like really bad, I can read the book and realize how badly the filmmakers screwed up*. Personally I enjoy movies more than books, its just the kind of person I am. "Life of Pi", luckily, seems to be a movie that managed to rather brilliantly fit in all of the most important pieces of meaning from the original novel, so I'd say "Life of Pi" as a movie is fulfilling enough that I can skip Yann Martel's novel. Its also Ang Lee's first truly successful effort, he was bound to get it right eventually.
At its core "Life of Pi" is actually a rather clever parable about the nature of faith. There is a frame story around the tale that Ang Lee included which deals with a fictionalized Yann Martel meeting his character, Pi Patel, and learning the man's story. Pi tells his life story, where he was shipwrecked all alone on a lifeboat with a single companion, Richard Parker**, a Bengal Tiger. This mismatched pair have to brave the endless deserts of the Pacific Ocean all alone in the middle of the endless blue. Unfortunately, that pay-off is rather subtle and requires spoilers. I'd have no choice in this review but to give it away, so I'd say you should watching "Life of Pi" first before reading further. Not that you'll be very bored during the viewing, since again, its a story of a boy and a tiger lost at sea. Its also a gorgeous movie with amazing visuals. Ang Lee films nature beautifully, and the CG work on the tiger is perfectly photo-realistic. Not a movie that should be missed.
Sunday, November 18, 2012
Detective Dee and the Mystery of the Phantom Flame
I mentioned this movie briefly during my review of "The Man With the Iron Fists" mostly as a counterpoint to how you could have a modern kung-fu movie with a complex plot and absurd action and still be good. However, I feel that a two sentence blurb really didn't do any of the movies I mentioned very much justice, and "Detective Dee and the Mystery of the Phantom Flame" really needed a bit more of my special touch. It also helps that this was the second or third best film of 2011*, and I did not even know this movie even existed until just August. Let me correct this now.
Detective Dee (or "Judge Di") is a historical Chinese figure from the reign of Empress Wu during the Tang Dynasty, who served as her finest minister and helped legitimize her unique position as the only true female Emperor. That doesn't really matter for this movie, because in the 20th century Detective Dee was found by the Dutch author, Robert van Gulik, who turned him into the Chinese Sherlock Holmes. The film version that I'm speaking of seems to be a Chinese reaction to the Robert Downey Jr. Sherlock Holmes series. "If Guy Ritchie can turn Sherlock Holmes into a psychic boxer, certainly we can turn Detective Dee into a kung-fu master!" So celebrated Hong Kong director Tsui Hark, best known for directing "Once Upon a Time in China", stepped up to the bat and made what is easily my favorite Wuxia film**, and one of the best Chinese films ever made in my opinion.
Typically the Wuxia genre features two things I really like and one feature I really don't, so the movies seem to begin with a lot of promise, then degenerate - for me - into unsatisfaction. I love the action, but they're only there to keep the cheap seats happy, I love the deep political plotlines and complex characters. However, I don't think I've ever seen a Wuxia film that ended well, they almost always seem to end not with a big action climax like I'd like, but instead the main character submitted to his death and then you realize that aside from the kung-fu, the rest of the movie was just dreary, not fun. Like "Hero" ends with Jet Li letting himself get devoured by a million arrows, which I suppose fits the theme of the movie well and "Hero" is a movie I respect, but its also an action movie and letting your invincible badass character get killed with such ease feels like an anticlimax. "Detective Dee" however, is a far more silly movie than "Crouching Tiger" or "Hero" or "Curse of the Golden Flower". This one has talking deer, and animated puppet kung-fu fighters, and people getting spontaneously combusted, and people's faces magically shifting, and a giant Buddha statue the size of the Empire State Building. Its a colorful detective romp that combines the serious drama of Wuxia, but tempers it in the thrills of over-the-top action and the suspense of a well-done mystery plotline. Maybe I'm just a lowest common denominator nimrod but I'll take the simply thrills over the complex emotions.
Detective Dee (or "Judge Di") is a historical Chinese figure from the reign of Empress Wu during the Tang Dynasty, who served as her finest minister and helped legitimize her unique position as the only true female Emperor. That doesn't really matter for this movie, because in the 20th century Detective Dee was found by the Dutch author, Robert van Gulik, who turned him into the Chinese Sherlock Holmes. The film version that I'm speaking of seems to be a Chinese reaction to the Robert Downey Jr. Sherlock Holmes series. "If Guy Ritchie can turn Sherlock Holmes into a psychic boxer, certainly we can turn Detective Dee into a kung-fu master!" So celebrated Hong Kong director Tsui Hark, best known for directing "Once Upon a Time in China", stepped up to the bat and made what is easily my favorite Wuxia film**, and one of the best Chinese films ever made in my opinion.
Typically the Wuxia genre features two things I really like and one feature I really don't, so the movies seem to begin with a lot of promise, then degenerate - for me - into unsatisfaction. I love the action, but they're only there to keep the cheap seats happy, I love the deep political plotlines and complex characters. However, I don't think I've ever seen a Wuxia film that ended well, they almost always seem to end not with a big action climax like I'd like, but instead the main character submitted to his death and then you realize that aside from the kung-fu, the rest of the movie was just dreary, not fun. Like "Hero" ends with Jet Li letting himself get devoured by a million arrows, which I suppose fits the theme of the movie well and "Hero" is a movie I respect, but its also an action movie and letting your invincible badass character get killed with such ease feels like an anticlimax. "Detective Dee" however, is a far more silly movie than "Crouching Tiger" or "Hero" or "Curse of the Golden Flower". This one has talking deer, and animated puppet kung-fu fighters, and people getting spontaneously combusted, and people's faces magically shifting, and a giant Buddha statue the size of the Empire State Building. Its a colorful detective romp that combines the serious drama of Wuxia, but tempers it in the thrills of over-the-top action and the suspense of a well-done mystery plotline. Maybe I'm just a lowest common denominator nimrod but I'll take the simply thrills over the complex emotions.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



