Thursday, December 2, 2010

Happy Hanukka, Illinois!

The state legislator of Illinois today gave its citizens a perfectly wonderful Hanukka present:  legalizing civil rights in the Land of Lincoln.  Starting June 1st of next year, couples of any sexual orientation can receive civil union licenses from their local governments.  I'm always happy to see another victory in the battle for recognition.  Its only a "civil union" license, and the tortured alternate phrasing is a conscious insult to same-sex couples, but still, its a step forward.  You gotta celebrate every victory.

Of course, this really doesn't change anything for Illinois's same-sex couples beyond just a legal sphere.  I say that if you want to be married, you're already married.  Have the ceremony, get a Reform Rabbi (or some other equally open-minded religious official), who cares if you don't yet have a certificate?  Even if you live in states that are especially backwards when it comes to standards of tolerance, like Texas or Mississippi, have that wedding.  Have your Dad walk you down the aisle, dance with your Mom at the reception.  A marriage is between you, your family, and God - and if God has anything to say about it, he or she has all eternity to object personally.  And if you anybody on Earth has anything else to say, well, it isn't there business.  President Obama himself can protest outside the Synagogue, Church, Mosque, or whatever venue you're getting married in.  But even the Leader of the Free World can't stop you.

So get married, Hanukka is a lovely time.  Mozeltov, same-sex couples, and Mozeltov, Illinois.

4 comments:

  1. Yeah! Go Illinois! Now let's hope the next victory is from a protest to GET GILGAMESH CONFIRMED IN VAAN'S PLACE FOR DISSIDIA DUODECIM! YEAHH!!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I hadn't heard about this yet. It's great news, but still an insult to same-sex couples. Why can't everyone just pull their heads out of their asses and see that heterosexuals and homosexuals are pretty much the same; gay men and women are not Satan worshippers who choose not to be "straight" (which, I think, is more insulting a term than gay, as it seems to send the message that straight people are right)?

    Don't know if any of you followed the election for a new govenor here in New York this year, but the winner of the Republican Primary, Carl Paladino, often repeated that gay people were detestable, and they made a conscious choice to be attracted to people of the same sex. I wish someone at a Q&A or press conference would've asked him when -he- made the concious choice to be attracted to women!

    ReplyDelete
  3. @Anonymous: I see you've missed the point of everything.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Honestly... I didn't really get the point of this post(no offense to Illinois)...

    ReplyDelete